SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 número2Efecto del consumo de aceite de girasol termooxidado sobre la competencia biomecánica de la mandíbula, en animales en crecimientoAvaliação do grau de conversão e das propriedades mecânicas de um compósito comercial com sistema avançado de polimerização índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana

versão impressa ISSN 0326-4815versão On-line ISSN 1852-4834

Acta odontol. latinoam. vol.36 no.2 Buenos Aires ago. 2023  Epub 31-Ago-2023

http://dx.doi.org/10.54589/aol.36/2/106 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The luminous transmittance of the quartz-glass fiber posts is superior to glass fiber posts

Superioridade da transmitância luminosa dos pinos de fibra de quartzo

1Universidade de Brasilia, Faculdade de Ciencias da Saúde, Brasilia, Brasil

2Universidade Positivo, Faculdade de Engenharia Civil, Curitiba, Brasil

3Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, Brasil

4Universidade da Regido de Joinville, Faculdade de Odontologia, Joinville, Brasil

5Centro Universitário Presidente Tancredo de Almeida Neves, Faculdade de Odontologia, São João del Rei, Brasil

6Universidade de Uberaba, Departamento de Biomateriais, Uberaba, Brasil

ABSTRACT

Fiber-reinforced prefabricated intraarticular posts have gained popularity due to several favorable characteristics for clinical use compared to metallic intraradicular posts. Aim: To evaluate the light transmission capacity of two types of fiber posts, using two different methods. Materials and Method: The posts were divided into two groups: experimental group - quartz-glass fiber posts (n=10) and control group – glass fiber posts (n=10). The light transmittance of the samples was compared by means of light intensity test by photographs and ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer. This test was analyzed by thirds: coronal, middle, and apical. The spectophotometer tested the luminous transmittance along the length of the post. The statistical analysis was conducted with a significance level of 0.05. Results: Light transmission was 97% on the coronal third, 68% in the middle third, and 27.66% in the apical third in the posts of the experimental group. In the posts of the control group, the light transmission was 95.33% in the coronal third, 80.66% in the middle third, and 41.33% in the apical third. Light transmission was significantly higher in the middle third of the posts of the experimental group when compared to the control group (p<0.05). The luminous transmittance of the posts of the experimental group was 97.4% with wavelengths of 400 nm, 97% at 450 and 500 nm, and 96.9% at 550 nm. In the posts of the control group, the luminous transmittance was 72.3% with wavelengths of 400 nm, 68.6% at 450 nm; 64.6% at 500 nm and 61.5% at 550 nm. The posts of the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher light transmittance than the control group (p<0.001). Conclusion: the luminous transmittance of quartz-glass fiber posts is higher than glass fiber posts.

Keywords: dental pins; photoelectron spectroscopy; light

RESUMO

Os pinos intra-articulares pré-fabricados reforçados com fibras têm ganhado popularidade devido a várias características favoráveis ao uso clínico em comparação com os pinos intra-radiculares metálicos). Objetivo: Avaliar a capacidade de transmissão de luz de dois tipos de pinos de fibra, usando dois métodos diferentes. Materiais e Método: Os pinos foram divididos em dois grupos: grupo experimental - pinos de fibra de vidro de quartzo e grupo controle - pinos de fibra de vidro. A transmitância de luz das amostras foi comparada por meio de teste de intensidade de luz por fotografias e espectrofotômetro ultravioleta-visível. Este teste foi analisado por terços: coronal, médio e apical. O espectrofotômetro testou a transmitância luminosa ao longo do comprimento do pino. A análise estatística foi realizada com nível de significância de 0,05. Resultados: A transmissão luminosa foi de 97% no terço coronal, 68% no terço médio e 27,66% no terço apical nos pinos do grupo experimental. Nos pinos do grupo controle, a transmissão de luz foi de 95,33% no terço coronal, 80,66% no terço médio e 41,33% no terço apical. A transmissão luminosa foi significativamente maior no terço médio dos pinos do grupo experimental quando comparado ao grupo controle (p<0,05). A transmitância luminosa dos pinos do grupo experimental foi de 97,4% com comprimento de onda de 400 nm, 97% em 450 e 500 nm e 96,9% em 550 nm. Nos postes do grupo controle, a transmitância luminosa foi de 72,3% com comprimento de onda de 400 nm, 68,6% em 450 nm; 64,6% a 500 nm e 61,5% a 550 nm. Os pinos do grupo experimental demonstraram transmitância de luz significativamente maior do que o grupo controle (p<0,001). Conclusão: a transmitância luminosa dos pinos de fibra de vidro de quartzo é maior do que pinos de fibra de vidro.

Palavras-chave: pinos dentários; espectroscopia fotoeletrônica; luz

INTRODUCTION

Fiber-reinforced prefabricated intraarticular posts have gained popularity due to several favorable characteristics for clinical use compared to metallic intraradicular posts. 1, 2 Notable qualities of the material include dentin-like mechanical properties, the ability to adhere to the root structure, and good esthetics 2, 3 . Scientific evidence demonstrates that prefabricated fiber-reinforced posts have an elastic modulus around 20 Gpa 4-6 , which is very similar to dentin (18 GPa) 7 . The convergence of properties standardizes the stress distribution and reduces the risk of fracture 8-10 . Another relevant aspect of fiber-reinforced prefabricated intraradicular posts is their ability to transmit light, enhanced by the association of carbon, glass, quartz, and zirconia fibers 11 . Translucent posts can allow lighter to pass through, improving the depth and quality of polymarization of the material chosen for cementation 12-14 .

Carbon fibers represent one of the first prefabricated posts available on the market. They are composed of unidirectional carbon fibers inserted in an epoxy resin matrix. They no longer represent routine use in clinical practice, mainly due to their dark color, which impairs the aesthetics of the restoration 15 . Glass fiber posts can be made of two types: S-glass and E-glass. They have different properties, but generally, are amorphous, and they are formed of a three-dimensional network of silica, with oxygen and other atoms arranged randomly 16 . Furthermore, Glass fiber posts can be associated with quartz fibers, which are pure silica in their crystallized form. Posts reinforced with glass and quartz fiber lead to better stress distribution when compared to rigid metal posts or zirconium oxide ceramic posts 14 . Fiber-reinforced posts also have advantageous optical properties over metallic post systems, reinforced by carbon fibers or metal oxide post systems 16 .

Glass fibers posts have a refractive index like resin; therefore, they allow efficient light transmission 16, 17 . Consequently, the addition of glass fibers to the dental composite will improve its mechanical properties without affecting the degree of conversion of the resin matrix, unlike opaque-colored fibers, as carbon, or zirconia 12, 16 . The clinician must realize that there are recognizably substantial differences in the mechanical load capacity of different fiber-reinforced posts and must be aware of such differences to select an appropriate post system to use 18 . Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the luminous transmittance of quartz-glass fiber posts and conventional fiberglass posts.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Experimental design

Quartz-glass fiber posts and glass fiber posts were evaluated for light transmittance using photo light intensity test and ultraviolet visible and infrared spectrophotometer. The posts were divided into two groups: the experimental group - quartz-glass fiber posts (n=10) and the control group - glass fiber posts (n=10). The posts in the experimental group are made by optical fiber, epoxy resin and glass fiber. The exact proportion is not revealed by factory. The composition of the glass fiber posts (Exacto®, Angelus Londrina, PR, Brazil) is 80% fibers glass and 20% epoxy resin. Both have a length of 18 mm, conical with the same maximum and minimum diameters of, respectively, 1.8 and 1.0 mm.

Analysis of the light transmittance using photo light intensity test

The light intensity was made with a LED dental curing-light Radii Expert SDI and a camera Canon 70D with lens macro 100mm and exposure settings in ISO 100, aperture F18 and shutter speed 125, therefore resulting in images of 5,612x3,440 pixels in RAW format. The spectrophotometer was connected to a computer running the spectrum analyzer software (OOIBase32, Ocean Optics). The software was set in a mode to evaluate the light counts correlating with the number of photons received from the spectrometer’s CCD detector. At the test of 470 nm, to each count, 30 photons were received on the equipment’s detector.

The counts were registered in total light-darkness for ten posts from each group. The posts were vertically positioned over a bench with the curing light Radii Expert SDI leaning at the cervical region. Furthermore, the photos of the posts irradiated by the light-curing device were taken in complete darkness (Canon 70D with lens Macro 100mm). The photos were divided in thirds: coronal, middle and apical.

Analysis of the light transmittance using ultraviolet-visible spectophotometer

The same posts were sanitized with 70% alcohol, stored in Eppendorf flasks and always handled with procedure gloves. After distribution and sample identification, they were submitted to an ultraviolet visible and near infrared spectrophotometer (Cary 5000 UV-Vis-NIR Spectrophotometer®, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, Califórnia, EUA). The mean exposure time was set at 10s, and the application distance was set at 10mm. The analyzed wavelengths were 400 nm, 450 nm, 500 nm and 550 nm. Light transmission was measured using an optical transmission microscope coupled to spectrometer. The upward referenced light source was transmitted through the edge of the cut and measured the percentage of light intensity (compared to the 100% reference) for each post. Valúes were given as the percentage of incident light measured at the opposite length of the post.

Statistical analysis

The analyzed all groups of specimens for means and standard deviations. The statistical analysis was performed by testing data normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test followed by Welch’s t-test, with a significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS

In the transmission of light in the posts of the experimental group was 97% on the coronal third, 68% in the middle third, and 27.66% in the apical third. In the posts of the control group, the light transmission was 95.33% in the coronal third, 80.66% in the middle third, and 41.33% in the apical third (Fig. 1). Figure 2 represents the difference in light transmittance in relation to the experimental and control fiber posts, respectively. Light transmission was significantly higher in the middle third of the posts of the experimental group when compared to the control group (p=0.0155) (Table 1).

Fig. 1 Luminous transmittance between the thirds of the posts of the experimental and control groups. 

Fig. 2 Illustrated photo of the luminous transmittance between the thirds of the posts of the experimental and control groups, respectively. 

Table 1 Means (standard deviations) of groups as a function of third. 

Group

Coronal

Mean

Apical

Exacto

97.00 (1.00) a

68.00 (4.35) c

27.66 (1.52) d

Experimental

95.33 (0.57) a

80.66 (4.61) b

41.33 (9.45) d

The luminous transmittance of the posts of the experimental group was 97.4% with om wavelengths of 400 nm, 97% at 450 and 500 nm, and 96.9% at 550 nm. In the posts of the control group, the luminous transmittance was 72.3% with wavelengths of 400 nm, 68.6% at 450nm; 64.6% at 500nm and 61.5% at 550 nm (Fig. 1). The values of light transmittance measured by spectrometer (mean and standard deviations) and the differences in the groups are shown in Table 2. The post of the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher light transmittance than the control group (p<0.001).

Table 2 Means (standard deviations) transmittance of the groups. 

Group

Transmittance

Exacto

0.66 (0.32) b

Experimental

0.97 (0.02) a

Figure 3 is related to the linear representation of the data obtained, in which the experimental group showed greater homogeneity and stability in light transmission throughout the analyzed spectrum (close to 0.97). The control group showed the greatest change throughout the analysis, and at the wavelength of 550 nm, there was the lowest mean transmittance (0.615); while the highest transmittance occurred at 400 nm, (0.723).

Fig. 3 Values of linear representation of the data obtained from the light transmittance of the groups as a function of the wavelength. 

DISCUSSION

In this study, the luminous transmittance through glass fiber posts and quartz-glass fiber posts was investigated. According to the results of this in vitro study, quartz-glass fiber posts showed significantly better luminous transmittance compared to glass fiber posts. The nuil hypothesis tested in this study that the luminous transmittance of different glass fiber posts would not differ was therefore rejected. From a clinical point of view, this may indicate better polymerization of the cementing agent used in the root canal 18 .

Resin-based cement is widely used today for the cementation of various indirect dental restorations that have received intraradical support 19 . Dual-curing resin-based types of cement are clinically preferred over purely light-curing types of cement because the former can better tolerate light exposure in locations that do not allow optimal access to curing light due to indirect-direction morphology 19, 20 . Compared to photopolymerizable resin-based materials, free radical-mediated polymerization of dual-polymerized materials is more complex, as two initiation reactions occur simultaneously and interact with each other 21 . Recognition of this complexity led to numerous studies on dual-polymerization resin types of cement 20 and, among other specificities, also the availability of the intraradical retainer in relation to luminous transmittance 11-14 .

Scientific evidence shows that there is no difficulty for light to reach a more superficial region of the intraradicular post 14, 22-25 . In this study, the evaluate of luminous transmittance was performed in thirds; the depth was defined in millimeters at six pre-established points 22 . Our results showed significantly higher luminous transmittance in the middle third of the quartz-glass fiber post when compared to the glass fiber post. This fact becomes important since favorable degrees of cure of the cementing agent have been described in depths above 8mm 23, 26 . Silva et al. studied the degree of conversion after the cementation of two types of posts at three levels of depth and demonstrated statistically favorable results between the middle thirds of the two types of posts also related to translucency 23 .

The luminous transmittance of glass fiber posts and zirconia, quartz, and silica have already been previously tested 27 . However, methodological differences were found in the digital camera, in the variety of posts designs such as, non-standard diameter and lengths, and a more robust sample. Thus, replication of this study is suggested, considering the results of the apical third. In the apical third, the p-value was very close to the significance level. The null hypothesis could be rejected if the sample was larger.

Regarding luminous transmittance analyzed by the UV/Vis spectrophotometer, better luminous transmittance was also demonstrated by the quartz-glass fiber posts, which may be related to the type and arrangement of the fibers, thus increasing the luminous transmission valúes. The result of this method can be considered extremely efficient in the present study, as the posts have the same design both in length and thickness. When irradiation occurs, the light beams are distributed along the posts by total internal reflection. The critical angle is the product of the difference in refractive indices between the core and surface material. Rays that exceed the surface boundary of the material at an angle greater than the critical angles are reflected 27 . Thus, differences in optical properties are explained by variability in fiber diameter, orientation pattern and variable matrix composition. All these factors contribute to refraction divergences and make it difficult to compare posts from different commercial brands 8,11-14,27, 28 .

The two luminous transmittance methods used in this study should be carefully used to estímate clinical performance. However, they can be correlated with the bond strength tests of the posts to the resin cement in the root canal, thus explaining possible favorable results for the quartz-glass fiber posts due to the greater luminous transmittance.

CONCLUSION

Quartz-glass fiber posts show significantly better light transmittance compared to glass fiber posts.

REFERENCES

1 Wang X, Shu X, Zhang Y, Yang B et al. Evaluation of fiber posts vs metal posts for restoring severely damaged endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Quintessence Int 2019;50:8-20 https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a41499Links ]

2 Sarkis-Onofre R, Amaral Pinheiro H, Poletto-Neto V, Bergoli CD et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing glass fiber posts and cast metal posts. J Dent 2020;96:103334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103334Links ]

3 Lassila LV, Tanner J, Le Bell AM, Narva K et al. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater 2004;20:29-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00065-4Links ]

4 Bateman G, Ricketts DN, Saunders WP. Fibre-based post systems: a review. Br Dent J 2003;195:43-48. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4810278Links ]

5 Novais VR, Quagliatto PS, Bona AD, Correr-Sobrinho L et al. Flexural modulus, flexural strength, and stiffness of fiber-reinforced posts. Indian J Dent Res 2009;20:277-281. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.57357Links ]

6 Lamichhane A, Xu C, Zhang FQ. Dental fiber-post resin base material: a review. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:60-5. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.60Links ]

7 Chun K, Choi H, Lee J. Comparison of mechanical property and role between enamel and dentin in the human teeth. J Dent Biomech 2014;5:1758736014520809. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758736014520809Links ]

8 AmiziC I, Baraba A, Ionescu AC, Brambilla E et al. Bond strength of individually formed and prefabricated fiber-reinforced composite posts. J Adhes Dent 2019;21:557-565. https://doi.org/10.3290/jjad.a43649Links ]

9 Ranjkesh B, Haddadi Y, Krogsgaard CA, Schurmann A et al. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary incisors restored with single or bundled glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts. J Clin Exp Dent 2022;14:e329-e333. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.59373Links ]

10 Santos TDSA, Abu Hasna A, Abreu RT, Tribst JPM et al. Fracture resistance and stress distribution of weakened teeth reinforced with a bundled glass fiber-reinforced resin post. Clin Oral Investig 2022;26:1725-1735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04148-4Links ]

11 Cekic-Nagas I, Ergun G, Egilmez F. Light transmittance of fiber posts following various surface treatments: A preliminary study. Eur J Dent 2016;10:230-33. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.178303Links ]

12 Bell-Ronnlof AL, Jaatinen J, Lassila L, Narhi T, et al. Transmission of light through fiber-reinforced composite posts. Dent Mater J 2019;38:928-933. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-217Links ]

13 Vieira C, Bachmann L, De Andrade Lima Chaves C, Correa Silva-Sousa YT et al. Light transmission and bond strength of glass fiber posts submitted to different surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:674.e1-674.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.031Links ]

14 Haralur SB, Alasmari TA, Alasmari MH, Hakami HM. Light transmission of various aesthetic posts at different depths and its effect on push-out bond strength, microhardness of luting cement. Medicina (Kaunas) 2022;58:75. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010075Links ]

15 Parcina I, Amizic S, Baraba A. Esthetic intracanal posts. Acta Stomatol Croat 2016;50:143-150. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/2/7Links ]

16 Safwat EM, Khater AGA, Abd-Elsatar AG, Khater GA. Glass fiber-reinforced composites in dentistry. BNRC 2021;45:190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-021-00650-7Links ]

17 Khan AS, Azam MT, Khan M, Mian SA et al. An update on glass fiber dental restorative composites: a systematic review. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2015;47:26-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.11.015Links ]

18 Hoshino IAE, Dos Santos PH, Briso ALF, Sundfeld RH et al. Biomechanical performance of three fiberglass post cementation techniques: imaging, in vitro, and in silico analysis. J Prosthodont Res 2023;67:103-111. https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr. JPR_D_21_00253Links ]

19 Heboyan A, Vardanyan A, Karobari MI, Marya A et al. Dental luting cements: an updated comprehensive review. Molecules 2023;28:1619. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041619Links ]

20 Carek A, Dukaric K, Miler H, Marovic D et al. Post-cure development of the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dual-curing resin cements. Polymers (Basel) 2022;14:3649. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14173649Links ]

21 Kwon TY, Bagheri R, Kim YK, Kim KH et al. Cure mechanisms in materials for use in esthetic dentistry: cure mechanisms in dentistry. J Investig Clin Dent 2012; 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-1626.2012.00114.xLinks ]

22 Roberts HW, Leonard DL, Vandewalle KS, Cohen ME et al. The effect of a translucent post on resin composite depth of cure. Dental Materials 2004;20:617-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.015Links ]

23 Faria e Silva AL, Arias VG, Soares LE, Martin AA et al. Influence of fiber-post translucency on the degree of conversion of a dual-cured resin cement. J Endod 2007;33:303-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.015Links ]

24 Radovic I, Corciolani G, Magni E, Krstanovic G et al. Light transmission through fiber post: the effect on adhesion, elastic modulus and hardness of dual-cure resin cement. Dent Mater 2009;25:837-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.004Links ]

25 Borges MG, Faria-e-Silva AL, Santos-Filho PCF, Silva FP et al. Does the moment of fiber post cutting influence on the retention to root dentin? Braz Dent J 2015;26:141-145. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201300242Links ]

26 Teixeira ECN, Teixeira FB, Piasick JR, Thompson JY. An in vitro assessment of prefabricated fiber post systems. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:1006-12. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0323Links ]

27 Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review. Aust Dent J 2011;56:77-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01298.xLinks ]

28 Keul C, Seidl, J Güth, JF, Liebermann A. Impact of fabrication procedures on residual monomer elution of conventional polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)—a measurement approach by UV/Vis spectrophotometry. Clin. Oral Investig 2020; 24:4519-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03317-1Links ]

FUNDING

This study was supported by a Grant from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES-Brasil) - PDPG-POSDOC/Bolsa-CAPES [nº 88887.755620/2022-00] (I.R.M.)

Received: January 01, 2023; Accepted: July 01, 2023

Corresponding Author: Leonardo Fernandes da Cunha cunha_leo@me.com

DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest regarding the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License