SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Referencias del artículo

NAU, Gerardo et al. Angiografía coronaria con técnica rotacional doble: eficacia y seguridad frente a la coronariografía convencional. Rev. argent. cardiol. [online]. 2012, vol.80, n.4, pp. 280-285. ISSN 1850-3748.

    1. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, Carabello B, Dehmer GJ, Eagle KA, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 1999;99:2345-57. [ Links ]

    2. Caixeta A, Mehran R. Evidence-based management of patients undergoing PCI: contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;75:S15-20. [ Links ]

    3. Solomon RJ, Mehran R, Natarajan MK, Doucet S, Katholi RE, Staniloae CS, et al. Contrast-induced nephropathy and longterm adverse events: cause and effect? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;4:1162-9. [ Links ]

    4. Garcia JA, Agostoni P, Green NE, Maddux JT, Chen SY, Messenger JC, et al. Rotational vs. standard coronary angiography: an image content analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009;73:753-61. [ Links ]

    5. Maddux JT, Wink O, Messenger JC, Groves BM, Liao R, Strzelczyk J, et al. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;62:167-74. [ Links ]

    6. Klein AJ, Garcia JA, Hudson PA, Kim MS, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, et al. Safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography vs. standard coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011;77:820-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22804. [ Links ]

    7. Garcia JA, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Hansgen A, Wink O, et al. Initial clinical experience of selective coronary angiography using one prolonged injection and a 180 degrees rotational trajectory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;70:190-6. [ Links ]

    8. Mehran R, Nikolsky E. Contrast-induced nephropathy: definition, epidemiology, and patients at risk. Kidney Int Suppl 2006;(100):S11-5. [ Links ]

    9. Schweiger MJ, Chambers CE, Davidson CJ, Blankenship J, Bhalla NP, Block PC, et al. Prevention of contrast induced nephropathy: recommendations for the high risk patient undergoing cardiovascular procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;69:135-40. [ Links ]

    10. McCullough PA, Wolyn R, Rocher LL, Levin RN, O'Neill WW. Acute renal failure after coronary intervention: incidence, risk factors, and relationship to mortality. Am J Med 1997;103:368-75. [ Links ]

    11. Rihal CS, Textor SC, Grill DE, Berger PB, Ting HH, Best PJ, et al. Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2002;105:2259-64. [ Links ]

    12. Grech V, Grech M, Debono J. Greater radiation savings at higher body mass indexes with dual axis rotational coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012 Apr 18. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24407. [ Links ]

    13. Lee JB, Chang SG, Kim SY. A comparison between dual axis rotational coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011 Nov 22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23415. [ Links ]