SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Referencias del artículo

LAMELAS, Pablo M et al. Evaluación del puntaje SYNTAX por residentes de cardiología clínica. Rev. argent. cardiol. [online]. 2012, vol.80, n.4, pp. 299-303. ISSN 1850-3748.

    1. Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, Fisher LD, Takaro T, Kennedy JW, et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet 1994;344:563-70. [ Links ]

    2. Rodriguez A, Bernardi V, Navia J, Baldi J, Grinfeld L, Martinez J, et al. Argentine Randomized Study: Coronary Angioplasty with Stenting versus Coronary Bypass Surgery in patients with Multiple- Vessel Disease (ERACI II): 30-day and one-year follow-up results. ERACI II Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:51-8. [ Links ]

    3. SoS Investigators. Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002;360:965-70. [ Links ]

    4. Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE, Jatene A, Bonnier HJ, Schnberger JP, et al; Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study Group. Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1117-24. [ Links ]

    5. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009;360:961-72. [ Links ]

    6. Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Garg S, Sarno G, Van den Brand M, Kappetein AP, et al. Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax study. EuroIntervention 2009;5:50-6. [ Links ]

    7. SYNTAX working-group. SYNTAX score calculator 2.02. Disponible en www.syntaxscore.com. Accedido el primero de noviembre 2011. [ Links ]

    8. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10. [ Links ]

    9. Wykrzykowska JJ, Garg S, Girasis C, de Vries T, Morel MA, van Es GA, et al. Value of the SYNTAX score for risk assessment in the all-comers population of the randomized multicenter LEADERS (Limus Eluted from A Durable versus ERodable Stent coating) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:272-7. [ Links ]

    10. Kim YH, Park DW, Kim WJ, Lee JY, Yun SC, Kang SJ, et al. Validation of SYNTAX (Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score for prediction of outcomes after unprotected left main coronary revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:612-23. [ Links ]

    11. Garg S, Sarno G, Serruys PW, Rodriguez AE, Bolognese L, Anselmi M, et al. Prediction of 1-Year Clinical Outcomes Using the SYNTAX Score in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A Substudy of the STRATEGY (Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Abciximab and Bare- Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and MULTISTRATEGY (Multicenter Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban Versus Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study) Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:66-75. [ Links ]

    12. Garg S, Serruys PW, Silber S, Wykrzykowska J, van Geuns RJ, Richardt G, et al. The Prognostic Utility of the SYNTAX Score on 1-Year Outcomes After Revascularization With Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Stents A Substudy of the RESOLUTE All Comers Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:432-41. [ Links ]

    13. Chakravarty T, Buch MH, Naik H, White AJ, Doctor N, Schapira J, et al. Predictive accuracy of SYNTAX score for predicting longterm outcomes of unprotected left main coronary artery revascularization. Am J Cardiol 2011;107:360-6. [ Links ]

    14. Girasis C, Garg S, Raber L, Sarno G, Morel MA, Garcia-Garcia HM, et al. SYNTAX score and Clinical SYNTAX score as predictors of very long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: a substudy of SIRolimus-eluting stent compared with pacliTAXel-eluting stent for coronary revascularization (SIRTAX) trial. Eur Heart J 2011;32:3115-27. [ Links ]

    15. Jou YL, Lu TM, Chen YH, Sung SH, Wang KL, Huang SS, Lin WT, Chan WL, Lin SJ. Comparison of the predictive value of EuroSCORE, SYNTAX score, and clinical SYNTAX score for outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012 Feb 14. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23450. [ Links ]

    16. Nam CW, Mangiacapra F, Entjes R, Chung IS, Sels JW, Tonino PA, et al. Functional SYNTAX score for risk assessment in multivessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1211-8. [ Links ]

    17. Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, Bax J, Boersma E, Bueno H, et al; ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent STsegment elevation of the European Society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011;32:2999-3054. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr236. [ Links ]

    18. Garg S, Girasis C, Sarno G, Goedhart D, Morel MA, Garcia- Garcia HM, et al. The SYNTAX score revisited: a reassessment of the SYNTAX score reproducibility. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;75:946-52. [ Links ]

    19. Shiomi H, Tamura T, Niki S, Tada T, Tazaki J, Toma M, et al. Inter- and intra-observer variability for assessment of the synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXUS and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) score and association of the SYNTAX score with clinical outcome in patients undergoing unprotected left main stenting in the real world. Circ J 2011;75:1130-7. [ Links ]

    20. Généreux P, Palmerini T, Caixeta A, Cristea E, Mehran R, Sanchez R, et al. SYNTAX score reproducibility and variability between interventional cardiologists, core laboratory technicians, and quantitative coronary measurements. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:553-61. [ Links ]

    21. Ibrahim TH, Mehmet E, Trgay I, Mustafa K, Ahmet K, Serdar S. Reproducibility of syntax score: from core lab to real world. J Interv Cardiol 2011;24:302-6. [ Links ]

    22. Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation 1976;53:627-32. [ Links ]

    23. DeRouen TA, Murray JA, Owen W. Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms. Circulation 1977;55:324-8. [ Links ]

    24. Beauman GJ, Vogel RA. Accuracy of individual and panel visual interpretations of coronary arteriograms: Implications for clinical decisions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16:108-13. [ Links ]

    25. Herrman JP, Azar A, Umans VA, Boersma E, von Es GA, Serruys PW. Inter- and intra-observer variability in the qualitative categorization of coronary angiograms. Int J Card Imaging 1996;12:21-30. [ Links ]

    26. Krouwer JS. Why Bland-Altman plots should use X, not (Y+X)/2 when X is a reference method. Stat Med 2008;27:778-80. [ Links ]